| Popis: |
External ventricular drain (EVD) and lumbar drain insertion are 2 of the most commonly performed neurosurgical procedures worldwide for acute hydrocephalus. Mechanical complications, such as obstruction or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, are often seen and may contribute toward significant patient morbidity. Different CSF drainage methods are advocated to reduce the incidence of complications, but evidence regarding comparative effectiveness is limited.In this single-center prospective cohort study, the incidence of mechanical complications and associated interventional factors, including choice of drain, collecting system, and location, were studied in patients requiring CSF diversion for acute hydrocephalus. Univariate analyses were performed to explore trends within the data, followed by a repeated-measures mixed-effects regression to determine the independent influence of drain device on mechanical failure.Sixty-one patients required CSF diversion between January 2020 and March 2021, via 3 different drain types (lumbar drain, tunneled, and bolted EVD) and 2 collection systems (LiquoGuard 7 and AccuDrain), performed in either theater or intensive care. Twenty-one patients (39%) experienced a mechanical complication, with blockage being the most common. Multivariate analyses showed that bolted EVDs (odds ratio, 0.08; confidence interval, 0.01-0.58) and LiquoGuards (OR, 0.23; CI, 0.08-0.69) were significantly associated with fewer mechanical complications compared with tunneled EVDs and gravity-based collection systems, respectively (P ≤ 0.01).Drain device has an influence on the occurrence of EVD-related complications. These preliminary findings suggest that choosing bolted EVDs and motor-assisted drainage can reduce drain-associated mechanical failure. A randomized controlled trial comparing drain devices is required to confirm these findings. |
Full Text from ScienceDirect