The need for co-product allocation in the life cycle assessment of agricultural systems—is 'biophysical' allocation progress?
Autor: | Stephen G. Mackenzie, Ilkka Leinonen, Ilias Kyriazakis |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
Hierarchy
Operations research business.industry 020209 energy Co product Context (language use) 02 engineering and technology 010501 environmental sciences 01 natural sciences Risk analysis (engineering) Environmental Science(all) Agriculture Premise 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering Key (cryptography) Economics Sensitivity (control systems) business Life-cycle assessment 0105 earth and related environmental sciences General Environmental Science |
Zdroj: | The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 22:128-137 |
ISSN: | 1614-7502 0948-3349 |
Popis: | Several new “biophysical” co-product allocation methodologies have been developed for LCA studies of agricultural systems based on proposed physical or causal relationships between inputs and outputs (i.e. co-products). These methodologies are thus meant to be preferable to established allocation methodologies such as economic allocation under the ISO 14044 standard. The aim here was to examine whether these methodologies really represent underlying physical relationships between the material and energy flows and the co-products in such systems, and hence are of value. Two key components of agricultural LCAs which involve co-product allocation were used to provide examples of the methodological challenges which arise from adopting biophysical allocation in agricultural LCA: (1) the crop production chain and (2) the multiple co-products produced by animals. The actual “causal” relationships in these two systems were illustrated, the energy flows within them detailed, and the existing biophysical allocation methods, as found in literature, were critically evaluated in the context of such relationships. The premise of many biophysical allocation methodologies has been to define relationships which describe how the energy input to agricultural systems is partitioned between co-products. However, we described why none of the functional outputs from animal or crop production can be considered independently from the rest on the basis of the inputs to the system. Using the example of manure in livestock systems, we also showed why biophysical allocation methodologies are still sensitive to whether a system output has economic value or not. This sensitivity is a longstanding criticism of economic allocation which is not resolved by adopting a biophysical approach. The biophysical allocation methodologies for various aspects of agricultural systems proposed to date have not adequately explained how the physical parameters chosen in each case represent causal physical mechanisms in these systems. Allocation methodologies which are based on shared (but not causal) physical properties between co-products are not preferable to allocation based on non-physical properties within the ISO hierarchy on allocation methodologies and should not be presented as such. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |