The use of dose quantities in radiological protection: ICRP publication 147 Ann ICRP 50(1) 2021

Autor: Richard Wakeford, François Bochud, J.R. Simmonds, John Harrison, P. Ortiz-López, Mikhail Balonov, Rebecca Smith-Bindman, Colin J Martin, Hans G Menzel
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of radiological protection, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 410-422
Harrison, J D, Balonov, M, Bochud, F, Martin, C J, Menzel, H-G, Smith-Bindman, R, Ortiz-López, P, Simmonds, J R & Wakeford, R 2021, ' The use of dose quantities in radiological protection : ICRP publication 147 Ann ICRP 50(1) 2021 ', Journal of Radiological Protection, vol. 41, no. 2 . https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/abe548
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/abe548
Popis: The International Commission on Radiological Protection has recently published a report (ICRP Publication 147; Ann. ICRP 50, 2021) on the use of dose quantities in radiological protection, under the same authorship as this Memorandum. Here, we present a brief summary of the main elements of the report. ICRP Publication 147 consolidates and clarifies the explanations provided in the 2007 ICRP Recommendations (Publication 103) but reaches conclusions that go beyond those presented in Publication 103. Further guidance is provided on the scientific basis for the control of radiation risks using dose quantities in occupational, public and medical applications. It is emphasised that best estimates of risk to individuals will use organ/tissue absorbed doses, appropriate relative biological effectiveness factors and dose–risk models for specific health effects. However, bearing in mind uncertainties including those associated with risk projection to low doses or low dose rates, it is concluded that in the context of radiological protection, effective dose may be considered as an approximate indicator of possible risk of stochastic health effects following low-level exposure to ionising radiation. In this respect, it should also be recognised that lifetime cancer risks vary with age at exposure, sex and population group. The ICRP report also concludes that equivalent dose is not needed as a protection quantity. Dose limits for the avoidance of tissue reactions for the skin, hands and feet, and lens of the eye will be more appropriately set in terms of absorbed dose rather than equivalent dose.
Databáze: OpenAIRE