Developing a patient portal for haematology patients requires involvement of all stakeholders and a customised design, tailored to the individual needs
Autor: | Tobias A. Wienhold, Gerard M. J. Bos, Paul A. F. Geerts, Celine Almekinders, Lise E. F. Janssen, Trudy van der Weijden, Pien G. M. Loeffen |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | MUMC+: MA Hematologie (9), MUMC+: MA Med Staf Artsass Interne Geneeskunde (9), Family Medicine, RS: CAPHRI - R6 - Promoting Health & Personalised Care, Interne Geneeskunde, RS: GROW - R3 - Innovative Cancer Diagnostics & Therapy |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male Telemedicine 020205 medical informatics Attitude of Health Personnel Health Informatics 02 engineering and technology DECISION-MAKING lcsh:Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics Medical Oncology Health informatics CANCER SURVIVORS 03 medical and health sciences Haematologic neoplasms 0302 clinical medicine Patient Portals Stakeholder Participation Neoplasms Physicians 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering Added value Humans Medicine Outpatient clinic Relevance (information retrieval) 030212 general & internal medicine Aged business.industry Health Policy Medical record Patient portal Hematology Middle Aged Patient Acceptance of Health Care medicine.disease Focus group Computer Science Applications MEDICAL-RECORDS lcsh:R858-859.7 Female Medical emergency ACCESS business Haematology Research Article |
Zdroj: | BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2019) BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 19:129. BioMed Central Ltd |
ISSN: | 1472-6947 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12911-019-0868-y |
Popis: | Background Electronic patient portals are increasingly being implemented, also in (haemato) oncology. However, portal usage is low and depends on user and provider engagement. We explored wishes, expectations and thoughts of patients with a haematologic malignancy and their physicians with regard to the electronic patient portal. Methods Based on insights from literature and a focus group discussion we built a 44-item questionnaire. This questionnaire was spread amongst patients with a haematologic malignancy at the outpatient clinic that was not yet exposed to patient portal facilities. Haematologists completed a questionnaire based on literature. Results Patients were interested in many different types of access to information and portal functionalities. However, their opinions varied about the provision of access to the portal to other people, the role of the physician, possibilities for communication via the portal and timing of access. The physicians acknowledged the relevance of the electronic patient portal, but had some worries about the patients’ autonomous information handling, organizational and technical issues. Patients frequently expressed to be open about the potential of the patient portal to orchestrate their care. Nevertheless, most physicians appreciated their supporting role towards the patient. Conclusions Patients and physicians appreciated the electronic patient portal. Both groups need to be involved in further portal development to improve engagement by meeting patients’ wishes, taking into account organizational and professional issues and managing expectations for both parties. To fit various patient profiles, portal design should be flexible and individualized. Further research should focus on the perceived added value and the impact on patient related outcome measures of portals. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-019-0868-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |