Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC-T)

Autor: Buket Büyükturan, Aysu Yetiş, Nuray Kirdi, Öznur Büyükturan, Mehmet Ilkin Naharci
Přispěvatelé: Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri, Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon ABD
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Psychometrics
Turkey
Visual analogue scale
Intraclass correlation
assessment
Pain
Validity
Severity of Illness Index
behavioral disciplines and activities
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Cronbach's alpha
Pain assessment
Surveys and Questionnaires
medicine
Aged
assessment
pain
Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC)

Homes for the Aged
Humans
030212 general & internal medicine
Geriatric Assessment
Aged
Pain Measurement
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
business.industry
Communication
Reproducibility of Results
General Medicine
Middle Aged
Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC)
Confidence interval
Checklist
Hospitalization
Convergent validity
Physical therapy
Dementia
Female
business
Mini-Mental Status Exam
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Zdroj: Volume: 48, Issue: 4 805-810
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
ISSN: 1300-0144
1303-6165
Popis: Background/aim This study aimed to assess validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC-T). Materials and methods The individuals who met inclusion criteria of the study were in patients of a hospital and a long-term care facility. Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE), Cornell Dementia Depression Scale (CDDS), Global Deterioration Scale (GDS), visual analogue scale (VAS), and PACSLAC-T were administered to all subjects. The scales were repeated with an interval of two weeks for test–retest reliability. Results A total of 112 patients with dementia were included in the study. The intraclass correlation coefficient ICC for test–retest reliability of the PACSLAC-T was 0.713 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.486–0.843. The Cronbach’s α coefficient for total PACSLAC-T was 0.842 for test and 0.888 for retest, which indicated substantial internal consistency. In convergent validity, there were significant correlations between PACSLAC-T total score VAS (r = 0.684, P < 0.001), while no correlation was found between PACSLAC-T total score and CDDS (r = 0.127, P = 0.094), and GDS (r = 0.096, P = 0.167). Also, significant correlations were found between PACSLAC-T total score and MMSE (r = –0.468, P = 0.016). Conclusion This study showed that PACSLAC-T could be a promising tool for the management of pain in older adults with limited communication skills.
Databáze: OpenAIRE