Tibial Spine Repair in the Pediatric Population: Outcomes and Subsequent Injury Rates
| Autor: | Kelly M. Tomasevich, Travis G. Maak, Taylor E. Hobson, Noah J. Quinlan, Temitope F. Adeyemi, Stephen K. Aoki, Alexander J. Mortensen |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
musculoskeletal diseases
medicine.medical_specialty Visual analogue scale business.industry Incidence (epidemiology) Rehabilitation Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation musculoskeletal system medicine.disease ACL injury Surgery Concomitant Operative report Medicine Current Procedural Terminology Original Article Orthopedics and Sports Medicine business Tibial spine Pediatric population |
| Zdroj: | Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation |
| ISSN: | 2666-061X |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.03.005 |
| Popis: | Purpose To evaluate short- to mid-term outcomes after arthroscopic operative fixation of tibial spine fractures in pediatric patients, to determine the incidence of further ipsilateral and contralateral knee injuries, and to describe associated meniscal pathology and intraoperative findings at the time of tibial spine repair. Methods All patients under age 18 with a tibial spine fracture treated arthroscopically at 1 institution by 2 surgeons from 2008 through 2019 were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients at least 1 year from their date of surgery were contacted to complete a questionnaire, which included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form. Questions pertained to knee function, pain, and further injury or surgery on either knee. Patient charts, preoperative imaging, and operative reports were reviewed to determine demographic information, tibial spine fracture type, concomitant injuries, and intraoperative details. Results Sixty-six of 97 eligible patients (68%) completed questionnaires. Average age at initial surgery was 10.7 years (range, 4-17). Mean follow-up was 5.8 years (range, 1.0-11.9). Average IKDC score at follow-up was 91.4 (range, 62.1-100). Patients reported their knee as 92% of “normal” (range, 40-100). Thirty-five (53%) currently participate in sport; 6 (9%) remain limited because of instability and residual pain. Regarding pain on a visual analog scale, 94%, 95%, and 83% of patients reported less than a 3 at rest, with daily activity, and with sport, respectively. Seven patients (11%) had subsequent ACL rupture. Six patients (9%) underwent ACL reconstruction 3.1 years (range, 0.9-7) after initial repair. Fourteen patients (21%) required at least 1 additional procedure. Regarding the contralateral knee, there were no ACL or tibial spine injuries. Sixty-one (92%) patients were both satisfied and would definitely undergo the procedure again. Conclusions Although many pediatric patients demonstrate excellent results after tibial spine repair at mean 5.8 years follow-up, 10.6% sustained an ipsilateral ACL rupture, and 21% required an additional procedure. No patient had a contralateral tibial spine or ACL injury. This is helpful when counseling patients regarding injury risk when returning to activity after tibial spine repair. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|