Fostering resilient agro-food futures through a social-ecological systems framework: Public–private partnerships for delivering ecosystem services in Europe
Autor: | François-Gaël Lataste, Kaley Hart, Jaroslav Prazan, Janet C Dwyer, Christopher J Short, Christophe Déprés, Marielle Berriet-Solliec |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Countryside and Community Research Institute, University of Gloucestershire, Francis Close Hall Campus, Swindon Road, Cheltenham GL50 4AZ, UK, Centre d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales Appliquées à l'Agriculture et aux Espaces Ruraux (CESAER), AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Territoires (Territoires), AgroParisTech-VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)-Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020] (UCA [2017-2020])-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), BRL Ingénierie, France, Institute for European Environmental Policy, Brussels, Belgium, Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information, Prague, Czechia, EU H2020 RTD programme633814, B.R.L. Ingénierie Co., AgroParisTech-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020] (UCA [2017-2020])-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement-VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS) |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
S1
European Union policy Geography Planning and Development 0211 other engineering and technologies Land management Public–private partnerships Public policy 02 engineering and technology 010501 environmental sciences Management Monitoring Policy and Law S604.5_Agricultural Collective action Ecological systems theory 01 natural sciences [SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences Ecosystem services Sustainable agriculture Environmental planning 0105 earth and related environmental sciences Nature and Landscape Conservation Global and Planetary Change GE Ecology Social-ecological systems 021107 urban & regional planning 15. Life on land Public good Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) 13. Climate action Sustainability Business S900_Conservation Public goods |
Zdroj: | Ecosystem Services Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, 2020, 45 (online), pp.101180. ⟨10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101180⟩ Ecosystem Services, 2020, 45 (online), pp.101180. ⟨10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101180⟩ |
ISSN: | 2212-0416 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101180⟩ |
Popis: | International audience; In recent decades, various public policies have targeted agriculture and forestry’s relationship with environmental protection and management. Among environmental policy communities the approach is increasingly framed through the theoretical concepts of ecosystem services (ES) or public goods (PG). Both offer useful perspectives to enhance understanding, but each only partially reflects the complex inter-linkages between productive land management and multiple environmental and social assets (biodiversity, landscapes, water, soil and air quality, rural vitality, culture and heritage), constraining their capacity for effective policy development. The Social-Ecological-Systems framework (SES), considering both natural and socio-economic elements in complex systems and interrogating these joint production relationships, offers added value in this context. The PEGASUS project1 applied an adapted SES framework to identify the potential complementary and synergistic roles of policy, private and community actors in promoting socially beneficial outcomes, strengthening ecosystem services and sustainability. Two case studies illustrate the analytical process and its ability to connect top-down and bottom-up perspectives. This generated an expanded range of options focused on social processes and market development facilitated by an enabling, responsive policy framework. Lessons for governance and practice, as well as international relevance, are briefly considered. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |