Emotional and cognitive reactivity: Validating a multilevel modeling approach to daily diary data
| Autor: | David A. Cole, Elizabeth A. Nick, Jason D. Rights, Cassandra R. Mick, Mallory A. Ford, Ruolin Lu, Abbegail J. Lovette, Yinghao Zhang, Megan E. Gabruk, Sophia R. Lubarsky |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male 050103 clinical psychology Emotions PsycINFO Models Psychological Neuropsychological Tests Young Adult Cognition Humans 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Reactivity (psychology) Association (psychology) Depression 05 social sciences Multilevel model Discriminant validity Construct validity Psychiatry and Mental health Clinical Psychology Convergent validity Multilevel Analysis Female Psychology Clinical psychology |
| Zdroj: | Psychological assessment. 32(5) |
| ISSN: | 1939-134X |
| Popis: | An increasing number of studies are applying multilevel modeling (MLM) to daily diary assessments of emotional and cognitive reactivity (ER and CR). Despite their generation of promising results, these methods have yet to be validated. The current study, consisting of 449 participants from over 90 different colleges and universities, had 2 goals: (a) to assess the convergent validity of these methods in relation to more conventional measures, and (b) to assess the construct validity of these methods in relation to depressive symptoms. Results support the extraction of within- versus between-person aspects of both constructs from daily diary data. Evidence of convergent validity derives from the association of MLM-based estimates of ER and CR with established self-report questionnaire methods. Evidence of construct validity derives from the relation of these estimates to symptoms of depression. The value of distinguishing within- from between-person aspects of ER and CR is discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved). |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|