International Survey on the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicines for Common Toxicities of Radiation Therapy
| Autor: | Zachary S. Morris, Anna Lee, Aleksandra Kuczmarska-Haas, Kaitlin M. Woo, Chris Freese, Meghan W. Macomber |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty Nausea medicine.medical_treatment 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Patient information Mucositis medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Intensive care medicine Radiation Practice patterns business.industry Palliative Care International survey medicine.disease 3. Good health Radiation therapy Skin toxicity Oncology Family medicine 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis medicine.symptom business Patient education |
| Zdroj: | Advances in Radiation Oncology |
| ISSN: | 2452-1094 |
| Popis: | Purpose Complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) are widely used by patients with cancer. However, little is known about the extent to which these potential remedies are used internationally to treat the most common toxicities of radiation therapy. We report on the results of an international survey that assessed the use of CAMs. Methods and Materials Surveys were distributed to 1174 practicing radiation oncologists. Questions evaluated the perceptions of CAMs and specific practice patterns for the use of CAM remedies in the treatment of common radiation-induced toxicities (eg, skin, fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, and mucositis/xerostomia). The responses were compared between the groups using the χ2 test and stratified on the basis of provider location, number of years in practice, and perception of CAMs. Results A total of 114 radiation oncologists from 29 different countries completed the survey, with a balanced distribution between North American (n = 56) and non-North American (n = 58) providers. Among the responding clinicians, 63% recommended CAMs in their practice. The proportion of clinicians who recommend CAMs for radiation toxicities did not significantly vary when stratified by provider’s number of years in practice (P = .23) or location (United States/Canada vs other; P = .74). Overall, providers reported that 29.4% of their patients use CAMs, and 87.7% reported that their practice encouraged or was neutral on CAM use, whereas 12.3% recommended stopping CAMs. The most common sources of patient information on CAMs were the Internet (75.4%), friends (60.5%), and family (58.8%). Clinicians reported the highest use of CAMs for radiation skin toxicity at 66.7%, followed by 48.2% for fatigue, 40.4% for nausea, and 36.8% for mucositis/xerostomia. Conclusions Nearly two-thirds of the surveyed radiation oncologists recommend CAMs for radiation-related toxicities; however, they estimated that less than one third of patients use CAMs for this purpose. This suggests a need for further investigation and perhaps greater patient education on the roles of CAMs in treating radiation toxicities. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|