A terminology for in situ visualization and analysis systems
| Autor: | Aaron Knoll, Paul A. Navrátil, Steve Petruzza, Venkatram Vishwanath, Michel Rasquin, Silvio Rizzi, Jeremy S. Meredith, Thomas Fogal, Jay Lofstead, Bernd Hentschel, David Rogers, James Kress, Han-Wei Shen, Franz Sauer, Cyrus Harrison, Tom Peterka, David Pugmire, Sudhanshu Sane, Charles Hansen, Kenneth Moreland, Berk Geveci, Matthew Wolf, Kwan-Liu Ma, Janine C. Bennett, Rhonda Vickery, William F. Godoy, Sean B. Ziegeler, Ingo Wald, Eric Brugger, Christoph Garth, Steffen Frey, Joseph A. Insley, Jean M. Favre, Andrew Bauer, Soumya Dutta, Gunther H. Weber, Sean Ahern, Matthieu Dorier, Ruonan Wang, John Patchett, E. Wes Bethel, Chris R. Johnson, Valerio Pascucci, Patrick O'Leary, Preeti Malakar, Norbert Podhorszki, Hongfeng Yu, Brad Whitlock, Matthew Larsen, James Ahrens, Robert Sisneros, Joseph A. Cottam, Scott Klasky, Manish Parashar, Hank Childs, Peer-Timo Bremer, Will Usher |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Computer science
Scientific visualization Umbrella term 020207 software engineering 02 engineering and technology In situ visualization Data science Theoretical Computer Science Visualization Term (time) Terminology In situ processing Hardware and Architecture Integration Type 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering medicine 020201 artificial intelligence & image processing medicine.symptom Distributed Computing Software scientific visualization Confusion |
| Zdroj: | The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, vol 34, iss 6 International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, vol 34, iss 6 |
| Popis: | The term “in situ processing” has evolved over the last decade to mean both a specific strategy for visualizing and analyzing data and an umbrella term for a processing paradigm. The resulting confusion makes it difficult for visualization and analysis scientists to communicate with each other and with their stakeholders. To address this problem, a group of over 50 experts convened with the goal of standardizing terminology. This paper summarizes their findings and proposes a new terminology for describing in situ systems. An important finding from this group was that in situ systems are best described via multiple, distinct axes: integration type, proximity, access, division of execution, operation controls, and output type. This paper discusses these axes, evaluates existing systems within the axes, and explores how currently used terms relate to the axes. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|