Exploring potential mediators of the cardiovascular benefit of dulaglutide in type 2 diabetes patients in REWIND
Autor: | Hertzel C. Gerstein, Manige Konig, Charles Atisso, Kelley R. Branch, Matthew C. Riddle, Helen M. Colhoun, Reema Mody, Mark Lakshmanan, Sohini Raha |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Blood Glucose
Male Glucagon-like peptide-1 medicine.medical_specialty Time Factors Recombinant Fusion Proteins Endocrinology Diabetes and Metabolism Glucagon-Like Peptides Type 2 diabetes Cardiovascular Risk Assessment chemistry.chemical_compound Internal medicine medicine Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system Albuminuria Humans Hypoglycemic Agents Dulaglutide Aged Original Investigation Mediators Glycated Hemoglobin business.industry Proportional hazards model Diabetes Hazard ratio Repeated measures design Middle Aged medicine.disease Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments Treatment Outcome Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 chemistry Cardiovascular Diseases Heart Disease Risk Factors RC666-701 Creatinine Female Glycated hemoglobin medicine.symptom Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Biomarkers Mace medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Cardiovascular Diabetology Cardiovascular Diabetology, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021) |
ISSN: | 1475-2840 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12933-021-01386-4 |
Popis: | Background The REWIND trial demonstrated cardiovascular (CV) benefits to patients with type 2 diabetes and multiple CV risk factors or established CV disease. This exploratory analysis evaluated the degree to which the effect of dulaglutide on CV risk factors could statistically account for its effects on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the REWIND trial. Methods Potential mediators of established CV risk factors that were significantly reduced by dulaglutide were assessed in a post hoc analysis using repeated measures mixed models and included glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR). These factors, for which the change in level during follow-up was significantly associated with incident MACE, were identified using Cox regression modeling. Each identified variable was then included as a covariate in the Cox model assessing the effect of dulaglutide on MACE to estimate the degree to which the hazard ratio of dulaglutide vs placebo was attenuated. The combined effect of the variables associated with attenuation was assessed by including all variables in an additional Cox model. Results Although all evaluated variables were significantly improved by treatment, only changes in HbA1c and UACR were associated with MACE and a reduction in the effect of dulaglutide on this outcome was observed. The observed hazard ratio for MACE for dulaglutide vs placebo reduced by 36.1% by the updated mean HbA1c, and by 28.5% by the updated mean UACR. A similar pattern was observed for change from baseline in HbA1c and UACR and a reduction of 16.7% and 25.4%, respectively in the hazard ratio for MACE with dulaglutide vs placebo was observed. When HbA1c and UACR were both included, the observed hazard ratio reduced by 65.4% for the updated mean and 41.7% for the change from baseline with no HbA1c-UACR interaction (P interaction = 0.75 and 0.15, respectively). Conclusions Treatment-induced improvement in HbA1c and UACR, but not changes in weight, systolic blood pressure, or LDL cholesterol, appear to partly mediate the beneficial effects of dulaglutide on MACE outcomes. These observations suggest that the proven effects of dulaglutide on cardiovascular disease benefit are partially related to changes in glycemic control and albuminuria, with residual unexplained benefit. Clinicaltrials.gov; Trial registration number: NCT01394952. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01394952 |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |