Auditing the AUDIT:A systematic review of cut-off scores for the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in low- and middle-income countries

Autor: Sonali Kumar, Mariam Ibrahim, Nathalie MacKinnon, Sheena Wood, Richard Velleman, Alison Garber, Anil Rane, Godwin Fernandes, Sheina Costa, Abhijit Nadkarni, Urvita Bhatia, Benedict Weobong
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: Nadkarni, A, Garber, A, Costa, S, Wood, S, Kumar, S, MacKinnon, N, Ibrahim, M, Velleman, R, Bhatia, U, Fernandes, G, Weobong, B & Rane, A 2019, ' Auditing the AUDIT : A systematic review of cut-off scores for the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in low-and middle-income countries ', Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol. 202, pp. 123-133 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.04.031
ISSN: 0376-8716
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.04.031
Popis: Introduction: The World Health Organization's (WHO) Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) is used extensively across the world, with cut-off scores recommended by the WHO. We reviewed the use and validity of AUDIT cut-off scores in low- and middle-income countries as cultural contexts are expected to influence the detection of alcohol use disorders. Materials and methods: The systematic review was guided by an a priori defined protocol consistent with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. We searched Cochrane library, Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Indmed, LILACS, and AJOL databases using appropriate search terms. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the data. Results: We identified 54 distinct studies that used AUDIT cut-off scores which were not in alignment with those recommended by the WHO. India (n = 10), Nigeria (n = 9), and Brazil (n = 9) produced most of these included studies. Most of the studies (n = 42) did not conduct psychometric evaluations of AUDIT cut-off scores. Of the twelve studies which did report psychometric results, a wide range of cut-off scores performed well. In these studies the cut-off scores to detect hazardous drinking ranged from >3 to >5, for harmful drinking from >5 to >16, and for dependent drinking from >7 to >24. Discussion: AUDIT is being widely used in LMICs and non-recommended cut-off scores are considered to be appropriate in these countries. It is important to systematically evaluate the psychometric properties of those cut-off scores to ensure the internal validity of the studies in which they are used.
Databáze: OpenAIRE