From the Journal of Psychiatry & Law Archives: Bernard L. Diamond. M.D. on 'The Psychiatrist as Advocate'

Autor:	Robert L. Sadoff, Kenneth J. Weiss
Rok vydání:	2012
Předmět:	Fallacy medicine.medical_specialty media_common.quotation_subject Context (language use) Impartiality Psychiatry and Mental health Expert witness Law Forensic psychiatry Professional ethics medicine Sociology Impossibility Psychiatry Contemporary ethics media_common
Zdroj:	The Journal of Psychiatry & Law. 40:121-133
ISSN:	2163-1794 0093-1853
Popis:	Dr. Bernard L. Diamond (1973) published the first article in the first issue of the Journal of Psychiatry & Law. Entitled “The Psychiatrist as Advocate,” it was a follow-up to his famous editorial, “The Fallacy of the Impartial Expert” (Diamond, 1959). Given the impossibility of total impartiality, the expert witness can still be ethical, but then undertake a form of activism. After nearly 40 years, we continue to reassess our boundaries as expert witnesses. In this article, the author has asked Dr. Robert L. Sadoff to comment on Dr. Diamond's ideas in the context of contemporary ethics.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f3a11a811d838fd2b54a57121b7ea564 https://doi.org/10.1177/009318531204000204 Zobrazit plný text záznamu Plný text ve formátu PDF