Optimization of methyl ester production from Prunus Amygdalus seed oil using response surface methodology and Artificial Neural Networks
| Autor: | Okechukwu Dominic Onukwuli, A. U. Ofoefule, Chizoo Esonye |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Biodiesel
Materials science Coefficient of determination 060102 archaeology Central composite design Correlation coefficient Renewable Energy Sustainability and the Environment 020209 energy Analytical chemistry 06 humanities and the arts 02 engineering and technology Transesterification food.food food Biodiesel production 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering Prunus amygdalus 0601 history and archaeology Response surface methodology |
| Zdroj: | Renewable Energy. 130:61-72 |
| ISSN: | 0960-1481 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.036 |
| Popis: | This research work investigated the optimization of biodiesel production from Sweet Almond (Prunus amygdalus) Seed oil (SASO) using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) models through base (NaOH) transesterification. The Central Composite Design (CCD) optimization conditions were temperature (30 °C to 70 °C), catalyst concentration (0.5%w/w to 2.5% w/w), reaction time (45 min–65 min) and oil/methanol molar ratio (1:3 mol/mol to 1:7 mol/mol). The physico-chemical properties of the seed oil and the methyl ester were carried out using standard methods. The fatty acids were determined using GC-MS and characterized using FT-IR techniques. An optimized biodiesel yield of 94.36% from the RSM and 95.45% from the ANN models respectively were obtained at catalyst concentration of 1.5w/w%, reaction time of 65 min, oil/methanol molar ratio of 1:5 mol/mol and temperature of 50 °C. The quality of the RSM model was analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Model statistics of the ANN showed comfortable values of Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 6.005, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 2.786 and Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) of 1.89306. The RSM and ANN models gave coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9446 and correlation coefficient (R) of 0.96637 respectively. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect