Correlation between operative time and crowd-sourced skills assessment for robotic bariatric surgery
Autor: | Samuel P. Dechario, Mark Jarrett, Andrew Yoo, Jermyn Addy, Jacqueline Duarte-Ramos, Anthony C. Antonacci, Poppy Addison, Filippo Filicori, Gregg Husk, Julio Teixeira |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Sleeve gastrectomy Future studies business.industry medicine.medical_treatment behavioral disciplines and activities Surgery Correlation 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Staple line medicine Operative time 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology Technical skills business human activities Statistic Abdominal surgery |
Zdroj: | Surgical Endoscopy. 35:5303-5309 |
ISSN: | 1432-2218 0930-2794 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00464-020-08019-z |
Popis: | Operative time has been traditionally used as a proxy for surgical skill and is commonly utilized to measure the learning curve, assuming that faster operations indicate a more skilled surgeon. The Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) rubric is a validated Likert scale for evaluating technical skill. We hypothesize that operative time will not correlate with the GEARS score. Patients undergoing elective robotic sleeve gastrectomy at a single bariatric center of excellence hospital from January 2019 to March 2020 were captured in a prospectively maintained database. For step-specific scoring, videos were broken down into three steps: ligation of short gastric vessels, gastric transection, and oversewing the staple line. Overall and step-specific GEARS scores were assigned by crowd-sourced evaluators. Correlation between operative time and GEARS score was assessed with linear regression and calculation of the R2 statistic. Sixty-eight patients were included in the study, with a mean operative time of 112 ± 27.4 min. The mean GEARS score was 20.1 ± 0.81. Mean scores for the GEARS subcomponents were: bimanual dexterity 4.06 ± 0.17; depth perception 3.96 ± 0.24; efficiency 3.82 ± 0.19; force sensitivity 4.06 ± 0.20; robotic control 4.16 ± 0.21. Operative time and overall score showed no correlation (R2 = 0.0146, p = 0.326). Step-specific times and scores showed weak correlation for gastric transection (R2 = 0.0737, p = 0.028) and no correlation for ligation of short gastric vessels (R2 = 0.0262, p = 0.209) or oversewing the staple line (R2 = 0.0142, p = 0.344). Operative time and crowd-sourced GEARS score were not correlated. Operative time and GEARS scores measure different performance characteristics, and future studies should consider using both a validated skills assessment tool and operative time for a more complete evaluation of skill. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |