COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN RIGHT HEMICOLECTOMY IN PATIENTS OF ASCENDING COLON TUMOR

Autor: null Muhammad Muneeb Saqlain Bajwa, null Bilal Afsar, null Muhammad Ayaz, null Afsar Ali Bhatti
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Pakistan Postgraduate Medical Journal. 33:72-75
ISSN: 2710-1924
2079-5858
Popis: Background: In addition to rectum, ascending colon and caecum can also develop cancer. Right hemicolectomy is the operation of choice for later two. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy is reported to have advantages of minimal invasive surgery, but some contradictory results were found. So the purpose of this study is the quest of truth. Objective: To compare the outcome of Laparoscopic and Open Right Hemicolectomy in patients of ascending colon tumors. Methods: This randomized Controlled Trial was conducted at Surgical Unit II, LGH, Lahore for 12 months from 2020-2021. Then 90 patients (45 in each group) were enrolled based on inclusion criteria. In group A, laparoscopic and in group B, open method was performed. Duration of surgery, hospital stay, wound complications and anastomotic leakage were noted. Data was recorded on proforma and analyzed in SPSS Vr. 25.0. Both groups were compared for duration of surgery and hospital stay by using independent samples t-test and for wound complication and anastomotic leakage by using chi-square test. P-value0.05). In laparoscopy mean duration of hospital stay was 6.47±1.24 days and in open surgery it was 7.96±1.35 days (p-value 0.05). In laparoscopy group no anastomotic leak occurred i.e. 0 (0.0%) patients, but in open surgery group, anastomotic leak occurred in 3 (6.7%) patients (p-value >0.05). In laparoscopy group, pain was mild in 41 (91.1%) cases while moderate in 4 (8.9%) cases and no patients had severe or excruciating pain. In open surgery group, pain was mild in 32 (71.1%) cases while moderate in 10 (22.2%) cases and 3 (6.7%) patients had severe pain but no patient had excruciating pain. The difference was significant (p-value
Databáze: OpenAIRE