A Randomized Trial of Dabigatran Versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism (RE-COVER II)

Autor: Sam Schulman, Ajay K. Kakkar, Eriksson Henry, Samuel Z. Goldhaber, Janet Schnee, Clive Kearon, Sebastian Schellong, Patrick Mismetti, Anita Vedel Christiansen
Rok vydání: 2011
Předmět:
Zdroj: Blood. 118:205-205
ISSN: 1528-0020
0006-4971
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v118.21.205.205
Popis: Abstract 205 Background: Dabigatran has been compared with warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in one previous trial (RE-COVER). Based on the low rate of the primary outcome as the RE-COVER study was running, we undertook this replica study to confirm the results of RE-COVER, and to allow for more rigorous sub-group analyses. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial of 2568 patients with acute VTE, treated with low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin for 5 to 11 days, we compared dabigatran, 150 mg twice daily, with warfarin, dose-adjusted to an International Normalized Ratio of 2.0 and 3.0, each given for 6 months. Primary outcome was recurrent symptomatic, objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism and deaths related to venous thromboembolism during 6 months. Safety endpoints included bleeding events, acute coronary syndrome, elevated liver function tests, and adverse events. Results: Of 1279 patients randomized to dabigatran, 30 (2.4%) had recurrent VTE compared with 28 (2.2%) of 1289 patients randomized to warfarin; risk difference 0.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], −1.0 to 1.5); p Conclusion: The study confirms that the efficacy of dabigatran is non-inferior to warfarin in the treatment of acute VTE and with a lower risk for bleeding. The safety of dabigatran is similar in the Asian population compared with non-Asians. Disclosures: Off Label Use: dabigatran for treatment of venous thromboembolism. Christiansen:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Schnee:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment.
Databáze: OpenAIRE