Evaluation of LES sub-grid scale models and time discretization schemes for prediction of convection effect in a buoyant pool fire
Autor: | Mohammad Safarzadeh, Ghassem Heidarinejad, Hadi Pasdarshahri |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
Discretization Turbulence 020209 energy Perturbation (astronomy) 02 engineering and technology Condensed Matter Physics Grid Euler method symbols.namesake 020401 chemical engineering 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering symbols Applied mathematics Crank–Nicolson method 0204 chemical engineering Scale model Large eddy simulation Mathematics |
Zdroj: | Heat and Mass Transfer. 57:631-646 |
ISSN: | 1432-1181 0947-7411 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00231-020-02952-4 |
Popis: | The identification of the type of regime has an essential effect on the selection of sub-grid scale and discretization methods, regarding the accuracy and computational time. In order to investigate the role of sub-grid scale and time discretization method in a pool fire modeling by the Large Eddy Simulation (LES), three sub-grid scales Smagorinsky, one-equation and Wall-Adapting Local Eddy-Viscosity (WALE) and three time discretization methods of first-order Euler method, second-order Crank Nicolson and backward second-order were investigated. The results indicate that WALE and one-equation sub-grid scale have an acceptable prediction, while Smagorinsky has a significant error with the experimental results. Different time discretization methods have little effects on the results of mean velocity and mean turbulent parameters of the pool fire. By considering the instantaneous distribution of parameters, all three methods perform similar results where the kinetic energy is less than 5 m2/s2. In areas where the perturbation is aggravated, the two second-order discretization methods have the same error with a little difference by the first-order Euler method. The accuracies of second-order methods are about 10% for the velocity prediction, compared to the experimental results, while the error of the Euler method is 15%. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |