Detecting faking responses during empirical research: a study in a developing country environment
| Autor: | Godson A. Tetteh, Kwasi Amoako-Gyampah, Amoako Kwarteng |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Project success
Knowledge management business.industry 05 social sciences 0211 other engineering and technologies Developing country Survey research 02 engineering and technology Structural equation modeling Empirical research 021105 building & construction 0502 economics and business Psychology business Lean Six Sigma 050203 business & management |
| Zdroj: | International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. 12:889-922 |
| ISSN: | 2040-4166 |
| DOI: | 10.1108/ijlss-03-2019-0019 |
| Popis: | Purpose Several research studies on Lean Six Sigma (LSS) have been done using the survey methodology. However, the use of surveys often relies on the measurement of variables, which cannot be directly observed, with attendant measurement errors. The purpose of this study is to develop a methodological framework consisting of a combination of four tools for identifying and assessing measurement error during survey research. Design/methodology/approach This paper evaluated the viability of the framework through an experimental study on the assessment of project management success in a developing country environment. The research design combined a control group, pretest and post-test measurements with structural equation modeling that enabled the assessment of differences between honest and fake survey responses. This paper tested for common method variance (CMV) using the chi-square test for the difference between unconstrained and fully constrained models. Findings The CMV results confirmed that there was significant shared variance among the different measures allowing us to distinguish between trait and faking responses and ascertain how much of the observed process measurement is because of measurement system variation as opposed to variation arising from the study’s constructs. Research limitations/implications The study was conducted in one country, and hence, the results may not be generalizable. Originality/value Measurement error during survey research, if not properly addressed, can lead to incorrect conclusions that can harm theory development. It can also lead to inappropriate recommendations for practicing managers. This study provides findings from a framework developed and assessed in a LSS project environment for identifying faking responses. This paper provides a robust framework consisting of four tools that provide guidelines on distinguishing between fake and trait responses. This tool should be of great value to researchers. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|