How to critically appraise a Systematic Review: an aide for the reader and reviewer
| Autor: | John Frewen, Marianne de Brito, Anjali Pathak, Richard Barlow, Hywel C Williams |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2023 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Clinical and Experimental Dermatology. |
| ISSN: | 1365-2230 0307-6938 |
| DOI: | 10.1093/ced/llad141 |
| Popis: | The number of published systematic reviews has soared rapidly in recent years. Sadly, the quality of most systematic reviews in dermatology is substandard. With the continued increase in exposure to systematic reviews, and their potential to influence clinical practice, we sought to describe a sequence of useful tips for the busy clinician reader to determine study quality and clinical utility. Important factors to consider when assessing systematic reviews include: determining the motivation to performing the study, establishing if the study protocol was pre-published, assessing quality of reporting using the PRISMA checklist, assessing study quality using the AMSTAR-2 critical appraisal checklist, assessing for evidence of spin, and summarising the main strengths and limitations of the study to determine if it could change clinical practice. Having a set of heuristics to consider when reading systematic reviews serves to save time, enabling assessment of quality in a structured way, and come to a prompt conclusion of the merits of a review article in order to inform the care of dermatology patients. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|