Accuracy, speed and repeatability of the voice assisted subjective refractor (VASR)
Autor: | Christina Newman, Jacob Weber, Alan G Kabat, Christopher Lievens |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Refractive error Visual acuity business.industry Repeatability medicine.disease Subjective refraction Refraction 03 medical and health sciences Ophthalmology 0302 clinical medicine Autorefractor Statistics 030221 ophthalmology & optometry Medicine Phoropter medicine.symptom business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Dioptre |
Zdroj: | Clinical Ophthalmology. 13:1807-1813 |
ISSN: | 1177-5483 |
Popis: | Purpose To compare the accuracy, speed and repeatability of the voice assisted subjective refractor (VASR) to traditional refractive methods. Methods Fifty healthy adult subjects were examined by autorefractor, followed by subjective phoropter refinement. Subjects were then evaluated using the VASR (Vmax Vision) to obtain an objective and subjective result. Three total assessments were performed for each subject using each of the methods described. Corrected visual acuity was recorded for each eye after each procedure. The total time was measured for both the traditional and VASR refraction. Results A comparison of the results obtained by traditional refraction and VASR revealed no statistically significant difference from the mean in equivalent sphere measurements (P=0.1383), and the datasets were highly correlated (r=0.993). The data comparisons for cylinder power and axis were similar (cylinder: P=0.6377, r=0.864) (axis: P=0.6991, r=0.738). VASR, on average, required 71 additional seconds to complete when compared to traditional phoropter refraction. In terms of repeatability, the average difference noted upon repeat of equivalent sphere power was 0.01 D for the phoropter (P=0.98) and 0.10 D for the VASR (P=0.23). For sphere power, the average difference was 0.02 D for the phoropter (P=0.55) and 0.07 D for the VASR (P=0.58). For cylinder power, the average difference was 0.02 D for the phoropter (P=0.11) and 0.03 D for the VASR (P=0.39). For all refractive methods, the differences between measurements amounted to ≤0.10 diopters, which is neither clinically nor statistically significant. Conclusion Refractive error results obtained with the VASR were not statistically different from those achieved using traditional phoropter methods. Time elapsed for the VASR was slightly longer than a more traditional refractive sequence. The VASR demonstrated clinically and statistically significant repeatability of measurement, consistent with traditional refraction. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |