A GINECO randomized phase II assessing addition of an aromatase inhibitor to oral vinorelbine in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients
| Autor: | Eric Legouffe, Thomas Bachelot, Benoit You, Francesco Del Piano, Dominique Beal-Ardisson, Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard, Tifenn Lharidon, Claire Garnier-Tixidre, Hélène Simon, Rémy Largillier, Mustapha Atlassi, Jean-Philippe Jacquin, Jean-Sebastien Frenel, Antoine Arnaud, Pierre Heudel, Claudiu Cornea, Laetitia Stefani, Sylvie Chabaud, Alain Lortholary, Fabien Brocard |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Clinical Oncology. 37:1043-1043 |
| ISSN: | 1527-7755 0732-183X |
| Popis: | 1043 Background: For ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC), efficacy of endocrine therapy + chemotherapy combination remain an open question. We hypothesized that continuing ER targeted therapy after progression in combination with chemotherapy may improve disease control. The objective of the CHEOPS trial was to assess the benefit of adding aromatase inhibitor (AI) to metronomic chemotherapy,oral vinorelbine, 50mg/3 time a week (OV) for AI pre-treated, ER+/HER2- mBC patients. Methods: Eligible patients had to have progressed on endocrine therapy and one or two lines of chemotherapy. They were randomized between vinorelbine (OV) and vinorelbine + AI (OV+AI). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). To show an increase of median PFS (from 3.5 to 5.5 month, HR 0.636), with alpha = 5% and power = 80%, 130 evaluable patients were needed. Results: 121 patients were Included (OV = 61; OV+AI = 60). Median age was 68 (range: 49-87), Median time from metastatic diagnosis was 3.2 years (range 0 - 16.9). 109 patients (90%) had visceral metastases. They all had previously received an AI and had been treated with one line (N = 66, 54.5%), or 2 lines (N = 55, 45.5%) of chemotherapy. Median PFS was increased from 2.3 months with OV to 3.7 months with OV+AI, but this difference was not significant (HR 0.73 [95 % CI 0.50-1.06], log-rank test: P = 0.09) 81 patients (67%) had at least one adverse event (AE) of grade ≥ 3 (40 (66%) for OV vs 41 (68%) for OV+AI). The most common grade ≥ 3 AE were: GT gammas (23%), neutropenia (18%), arterial hypertension and lymphopenia (17%). The occurrence of 3 toxic deaths (OV = 1; OV+AI = 2) secondary to febrile aplasia motivated the early cessation of this clinical trial. 9 patients (5 OV (10%) and 4 OV+AI (8%) presented an objective complete or partial response. Conclusions: The addition of AI to OV over OV alone in AI resistant mBC was associated with a non-significant improvement of PFS, but both PFS are lower than expected. Metronomic OV schedule, at 50 mg three times a week, requires close biological monitoring. The question of hormonal treatment and chemotherapy combination remains open. Clinical trial information: EudraCT Number: 2015-000401-39. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|