Organic chemistry of dinuclear metal centres. Part 14. Synthesis, X-Ray structure, and reactivity of the ruthenium–ruthenium double-bonded complex [Ru2(μ-CO)(μ-C2Ph2)(η-C5H5)2]
| Autor: | Robert Edgar Colborn, Selby A. R. Knox, Kirsty A. Macpherson, Kevin A. Mead, A. Guy Orpen, Andrew F. Dyke, Benjamin P. Gracey |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 1990 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.. :761-771 |
| ISSN: | 1364-5447 0300-9246 |
| DOI: | 10.1039/dt9900000761 |
| Popis: | Ultraviolet irradiation of the metallacycle [Ru2(CO)(μ-CO){μ-C(O)C2Ph2}(η-C5H5)2] (1) in tetrahydrofuran (thf) gives the complex [Ru2(μ-CO)(μ-C2Ph2)(η-C5H5)2] (2), shown by X-ray diffraction to have a ruthenium–ruthenium double bond [RuRu 2.505(1) A] bridged transversely by a diphenylacetylene ligand. The loss of two molecules of CO in forming (2) is reversible; under 100 atm of CO at 50 °C complex (2) is converted into (1) in 60% yield. Treatment of unsaturated complex (2) with diazoalkanes RCHN2 (R = H, Me, or CO2Et) results in the corresponding uptake of two alkylidene units to form [Ru2(CO)(μ-CHR){η-C(Ph)C(Ph)CHR}(η-C5H5)2], existing as isomers for R = Me or CO2Et due to differing orientations of the μ-CHR substituent. The structure of [Ru2(CO)(μ-CH2){μ-C(Ph)C(Ph)CH2}(η-C5H5)2] (3) has been established by X-ray diffraction, revealing that one methylene co-ordinates to the dinuclear metal centre while the other links with the alkyne. There are non-bonding C–C distances of 3.07 A between the two μ-carbons of the complex, but only 2.78 A separating the μ-CH2 carbon and the CH2 carbon of the C(Ph)C(Ph)CH2 ligand. On thermolysis the latter two carbons link, accompanied by other processes, to afford [Ru2(CO)(μ-CO){μ-C(Ph)C(Ph)CHMe}(η-C5H5)2] (5). A co-product of the reaction of diazoethane with (2) is the di-μ-vinyl complex [Ru2(CO) (μ-CHCH2){μ-C(Ph)CHPh}(η-C5H5)2] (8). X-ray diffraction reveals that the two β-carbons of the vinyl groups are 2.99 A apart and it is these rather than the two μ(α) carbons (3.06 A apart) which link on thermolysis, affording complex (5) once more. Thermolysis of [Ru2(CO)(μ-CHCO2Et){μ-C(Ph)C(Ph)CH(CO2Et)}(η-C5H5)2] does not effect carbon–carbon bond formation. Instead, CO is ejected and its site occupied by an oxygen of a carboethoxy group in the complex [Ru2(μ-CHCO2Et){μ-C(Ph)C(Ph)CHC(O)OEt}(η-C5H5)2]. Treatment of complex (1) with BH3·thf or LiMe–HBF4–NaBH4 converts the metallacyclic ketone group into CH2 or CHMe respectively, yielding [Ru2(CO)(μ-CO){μ-C(Ph)C(Ph)CHR}(η-C5H5)2] (R = H or Me). The nature of the processes observed on thermolysis of complexes (3) and (8) suggests the importance of least-motion effects in determining the course of carbon–carbon bond formation at a dinuclear metal centre. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|