USE OF THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR WORK CONSISTENCY ESTIMATION OF EXPERTS OF THE REGIONAL SUBJECT COMMISSIONS ON ASSESSMENT OF THE PROBLEMS WITH DETAILED ANSWERS OF THE GENERAL STATE EXAM AND THE UNIFIED STATE EXAM
| Autor: | G. Sh. Shkaberina, Pavel O. Krasnov |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Estimation
Computer science Management science Process (engineering) 010102 general mathematics Frame (networking) Analytic hierarchy process Subject (documents) 0102 computer and information sciences General Medicine General Chemistry Commission 01 natural sciences Consistency (negotiation) Work (electrical) 010201 computation theory & mathematics 0101 mathematics |
| Zdroj: | Informatics and Education. :20-25 |
| ISSN: | 0234-0453 |
| DOI: | 10.32517/0234-0453-2018-33-8-20-25 |
| Popis: | Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for work consistency estimation of experts of the regional subject commissions on assessment of the problems with detailed answers of the General State Exam and the Unified State Exam is considered in the paper. This process is a mathematical technique of system approach for the complex problems of decision making. It is used in the different fields from management on interstate level to the solving the sectoral and particular problems in business, industry, public health and education. Its use for work consistency estimation of experts of the regional subject commissions on assessment of the problems with detailed answers of the General State Exam and the Unified State Exam is conditioned by a need of such technique development which will allow decreasing extremely the influence of subjectivity at commission formation as well as at awarding the status to ones and others experts inside the commission. And this is the key specialty of this process because in the most cases the approaches, considered for the solving the similar problems, are based on the results of the third (seniors or leading) experts as standard. Suggested technique allows estimating the work of every concrete expert in the frame of all commission even at the case, when he was carrying out cross validation with only some others its members. At thus the status of expert is not significant for estimation his efficiency but the absence or presence a difference in grades suggested by him and other commission members for problems solutions of exam participant are significant. At the same time the efficiency of last ones work is also estimated personally by the similar way at the consideration of their cross validations with other expert groups. Suggested principle of Analytic Hierarchy Process’ application allows using the results of work of the regional subject commissions on assessment of the problems with detailed answers of the General State Exam and the Unified State Exam in the current year for modification of the commission in the next one with a purpose to enhance the consistency of exam works validation by the experts. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|