Cautious Thoughts on 'A Social Priming Data Set With Troubling Oddities'

Autor:	Randall L. Rose
Rok vydání:	2016
Předmět:	Social Psychology media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences Chatterjee 050105 experimental psychology Mentorship 0502 economics and business Loyalty Priming (media) 050211 marketing 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Scientific validity Psychology Social psychology Applied Psychology Skepticism media_common
Zdroj:	Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 38:30-32
ISSN:	1532-4834 0197-3533
DOI:	10.1080/01973533.2015.1127237
Popis:	Pashler, Rohrer, Abramson, Wolfson, and Harris (2016/this issue) identify a number of features of the data in Chatterjee, Rose, and Sinha (2013), particularly in Study 3, that cause them to question the scientific validity of the conclusions drawn from the data. Based on the critics’ analyses and my own investigation, I concur that Study 3 data are likely unreliable. However, Pashler et al. question the scientific validity of all three studies while providing support for their skepticism only for Study 3, clearly an overgeneralization. The processes leading to the original publication and the critics’ challenge to the original work highlight some crucial questions regarding trust, loyalty, mentorship, and oversight in multiple authored articles.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::36090b2a06b1280eceae05fe961a5dec https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1127237 Zobrazit plný text záznamu Plný text ve formátu PDF Plný text ve formátu HTML
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje	K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.