The Problem of State Territorial Obligations
Autor: | David L. Attanasio |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
050502 law
Difficult problem media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences Positive obligations 06 humanities and the arts 0603 philosophy ethics and religion Power (social and political) Philosophy Politics Principal (commercial law) Prima facie State (polity) Political science 060302 philosophy Political philosophy 0505 law media_common Law and economics |
Zdroj: | The Journal of Ethics. 24:427-448 |
ISSN: | 1572-8609 1382-4554 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10892-020-09335-1 |
Popis: | This article argues, first, that there is an unappreciated and difficult problem of explaining why states have positive obligations to perform certain actions—such as providing minimum protection—for all those persons in their territories and, second, that one possible solution is to locate the source of the obligations in the political power that states assume over their territories. The article analyzes the principal, superficially plausible accounts of state territorial obligations and shows that they each fail. Among the reasons for the failure is that these accounts cannot explain the existence of territorial obligations in important cases where we would expect the state to have such obligations. The article then argues for an account in terms of state political power that both avoids the major problems affecting other explanations and rests on prima facie plausible moral foundations. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |