Test Score Equating Using a Mini-Version Anchor and a Midi Anchor: A Case Study Using SAT®Data
| Autor: | Jinghua Liu, Miriam Feigenbaum, Edward Curley, Paul W. Holland, Sandip Sinharay |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2011 |
| Předmět: |
Systematic error
ComputingMilieux_THECOMPUTINGPROFESSION MIDI Computer science Contrast (statistics) computer.file_format Education Cost savings Anchor test ComputerApplications_MISCELLANEOUS Test score Equating Developmental and Educational Psychology Econometrics Psychology (miscellaneous) Arithmetic computer Applied Psychology |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Educational Measurement. 48:361-379 |
| ISSN: | 0022-0655 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2011.00150.x |
| Popis: | This study explores an anchor that is different from the traditional miniature anchor in test score equating. In contrast to a traditional “mini” anchor that has the same spread of item difficulties as the tests to be equated, the studied anchor, referred to as a “midi” anchor (Sinharay & Holland), has a smaller spread of item difficulties than the tests to be equated. Both anchors were administered in an operational SAT administration and the impact of anchor type on equating was evaluated with respect to systematic error or equating bias. Contradicting the popular belief that the mini anchor is best, the results showed that the mini anchor does not always produce more accurate equating functions than the midi anchor; the midi anchor was found to perform as well as or even better than the mini anchor. Because testing programs usually have more middle difficulty items and few very hard or very easy items, midi external anchors are operationally easier to build. Therefore, the results of our study provide evidence in favor of the midi anchor, the use of which will lead to cost saving with no reduction in equating quality. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text