Published- Comparison between supra-scapular nerve block combined with axillary nerve block and interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative analgesia following shoulder arthroscopy

Autor: Mostafa Gamale Mahran, Rania Magy Aly, Sherif Farouk Elshantory, Mahmoud Saeed Elbermway
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
Zdroj: Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care. 26:674-680
ISSN: 2220-5799
1607-8322
DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i5.2026
Popis: Background & objective: Inter-scalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is the gold standard for postoperative pain management in shoulder surgery. Although, this method has its side-effects and possibly complications. Supra-scapular nerve block and axillary nerve block have also been used in upper limb procedures. We compared ISB with the blockade of supra-scapular and axillary nerves (called shoulder block) for postoperative analgesia after shoulder arthroscopic surgical operation under ultrasound guidance (USG) and nerve stimulators. Methodology: It was a prospective, randomized, comparative study. Results: The VAS pain scores at different times postoperatively were not significantly different between the ISB and ShB groups (P = t 0.071, 0.28, 0.378, 0.358, 0.451 at 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 h respectively. VAS 0 was significantly difference (P = 0.029) but still the VAS score was less than 3, so no pain killers were given. Conclusion: Ultrasound guided supra-scapular and axillary nerve blocks ae equally effective as inter-scalene brachial plexus block for postoperative analgesia in shoulder arthroscopic surgery with less side-effects. Abbreviations: ANB: Axillary Nerve Block; ISB: Interscalene Block; MAC: Minimum OR: Operating Room; REC: Research Ethics Committee; ShB: Shoulder Block; SSB: Supra-scapular Nerve Block; VAS: Visual Analogue Scale Citation: Elbermway MS, Elshantory SF, Aly RM, Mahran MG. Comparison between supra-scapular nerve block combined with axillary nerve block and interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative analgesia following shoulder arthroscopy. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2022;26(5):674−680; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i5.2026
Databáze: OpenAIRE