Characteristics and risk factors associated with mortality during the first cycle of prone secondary to ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia

Autor: Cecilia Gonzalez, Gabriel Musso, Jesica Rodriguez Louzan, Juan Manuel Dominguez, Celeste Gomez, Gabriel Appendino, Analia Abarca, Lucio Clemente, Ezequiel Baravalle, Diana Latasa, Antonella Lopipi, Juliana Rango, Giuliana Stezer, Santiago Calabrono, Luisina Finos, Luciano Berloni, Estefania Pizzo, Fernando Gerber, Melina Cavagnari, Gustavo Suarez, Gustavo Alessio, Florencia Montagner, Ornella Abbondanzieri, Lucas Idbetan, Faustino Bracconi, Agnel Ramos, Martin Manago, Carlos Lovesio, Elisa Estenssoro
Rok vydání: 2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1594288/v1
Popis: IntroductionEarly identification of patients with failure to prone position allows other treatments which could decrease mortality. The objective of our study was: describe the characteristics, behavior of oxygenation and pulmonary mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 treated with prone position. Secondary objectives were identify independent determinants of mortality; particularly, number of prone cycles associated with mortality.MethodsIt was a prospective study. All patients with 2/FiO2 ratio and prone position were included and classified according to the PaO2/FiO2 behavior after the first prone cycle: 1) No increase, 2) Increase < 25%, 3) 25-50% increase 4) Increase >50%. The number of prone cycles was also recorded. Baseline characteristics, severity scores, respiratory mechanics and PaO2/FiO2 ratio behavior were compared between survivors and non-survivors.Statistical analysis was performed by Mann Whitney's, Chi² Test and Wilcoxon range tests. Independent factors associated with in-hospital mortality were identified by means of Cox regression.Results273 were treated with prone position over 18 months. The baseline PaO2/FiO2 was 116 [97-135] mmHg (115 [94-136] in survivors versus 117 [98-134] in non-survivors; p=0.50). After prone position, 22 patients (8%) had the same value in PaO2/FiO2 ratio; 46 patients (16%) showed an increase equal less or equal 25%; in 55 patients (21%) there was an increase between 25 and 50% over baseline; and in 150 patients (55%) the rise was greater than 50%. Mortality was 86%, 87%, 72%, 50% respectively. (p2/FiO2, ratio < 100 mmHg did not imply that the patient was refractory to the prone position.Of the 273 patients, 127 (46%) required 1 prone cycle, 57 (20%) 2 cycles, 50 (17%) 3 cycles, 17 (6%) had 4 cycles and 19 (7%) 5 or more cycles. Mortality was 55%, 70%, 70%, 82%, and 70% respectively (p2/FiO2 after 24 hours in prone, age, and the number of prone cycles. ConclusionsOlder patients unable to improve PaO2/FiO2 after 24 hours in prone and who require more than 1 prone cycle, may be candidates for other treatments for refractory hypoxemia.
Databáze: OpenAIRE