Artificial Intelligence Cases in China: Feilin v. Baidu and Tencent Shenzhen v. Shanghai Yingxin

Autor:	Ju Yoen Lee
Rok vydání:	2021
Předmět:	business.industry media_common.quotation_subject Economics Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Work (electrical) Beijing Originality Political science Law Political Science and International Relations The Internet China business media_common
Zdroj:	China and WTO Review. 7:211-222
ISSN:	2384-4388 2383-8221
Popis:	In 2019, two court rulings in China on the issue of copyrightability of AI creations received international attention. It was reported that in Feilin v. Baidu, known as the first AI case, the Beijing Internet Court denied copyright of AI creations, whereas the Shenzhen Nanshan District People’s Court acknowledged copyright of AI creations in the Tencent Dreamwriter case. The two cases, however, were quite similar, as they acknowledged copyright of AIassisted, not AI-generated, written works and recognized these works as a work of a legal entity. The difference between the two judgments is that the Beijing Internet Court regarded originality as an independent requirement and judged it according to the objective standard, whereas the Shenzhen Nanshan District People’s Court regarded human creation as part of the requirement of originality. In this sense, it was the Beijing Internet Court that actually made the more favorable judgment on an AI-generated work.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::0dc4b6358ce6a858cee28f1d244c9b41 https://doi.org/10.14330/cwr.2021.7.1.11 Zobrazit plný text záznamu