Who’s practicing expedited partner therapy and why? Insights from providers working in high STI-volume specialties
| Autor: | Anandi N. Sheth, Megan McCool-Myers, Peggy G. Wickham, Megan C. Henn, Melissa Kottke |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Microbiology (medical)
Sexual partner medicine.medical_specialty 030505 public health business.industry Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health MEDLINE Dermatology Emergency department 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Infectious Diseases Family medicine Ethical dilemma Medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Hiv status Medical prescription 0305 other medical science business Empiric treatment Qualitative research |
| Zdroj: | Sexually Transmitted Diseases. |
| ISSN: | 0148-5717 |
| DOI: | 10.1097/olq.0000000000001337 |
| Popis: | BACKGROUND Expedited partner therapy (EPT), the practice of prescribing antibiotics for sexual partners of patients, is underutilized in Georgia. This qualitative study in a large urban institution aimed to (1) characterize the clinical specialties that predominantly treat sexually transmitted infections (STIs), (2) identify perceived barriers to EPT, and (3) describe strategies to advance routine EPT use. METHODS Providers in obstetrics/gynecology (OB/GYN), infectious disease (ID), and emergency medicine (EM) were interviewed using a structured discussion guide. Transcripts were double-coded and iteratively analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Barriers and strategies were summarized and supported with quotes from providers (n = 23). RESULTS Perceived EPT barriers overlapped across OB/GYN, ID, and EM, yet the settings were diverse in their patient populations, resources, and concerns. Providers in OB/GYN were the only ones practicing EPT, yet there was a lack of standardization. Providers in ID noted that an EPT prescription from an ID provider could inadvertently disclose the HIV status of a patient to a sexual partner, posing an ethical dilemma. Providers in EM exhibited readiness for EPT, although routine empiric treatment for index patients in EM (estimated at 90%) gave some providers pause in prescribing for partners: "I do not know what I'm treating." Point-of-care testing could increase providers' confidence in prescribing EPT, yet some worried it could contribute to overutilization of the emergency department as a sexually transmitted infection clinic. All settings prioritized setting-specific training and protocols. CONCLUSIONS Providers in OB/GYN, ID, and EM report unique hurdles, specific to their settings and patient populations; tailored EPT implementation strategies, particularly provider training, are urgently needed to improve patient/partner outcomes. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|