D16.3 Proposal of procedures for assessment of preventive and active safety functions

Autor: Scholliers, J., Heinig, K., Blosseville, J.M., Netto, M., Anttila, V., Leanderson, S., Engström, J., Aust, M.L., Hendriks, F.M., Ploeg, J., Chen, J.
Přispěvatelé: TNO Defensie en Veiligheid
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2007
Předmět:
Popis: PReVAL addresses the possible safety impacts of functions developed and demonstrated in the PReVENT integrated project. One of the major aims of the PReVAL project is the development of a harmonized framework for the assessment of preventive safety applications and advanced driver assistance functions. The work described in this deliverable is a major step towards this objective. In deliverable D16.1 [1] the evaluation methodologies used by the PReVENT subprojects and related projects, such as eIMPACT, APROSYS, AIDE and CONVERGE were reviewed. Based on this work, evaluation procedures are proposed for technical performance. Authors ii Subproject Leader ii IP Coordinator ii Revision chart and history log iii Table of contents iv Executive summary 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Methodology 5 2.1 Technical evaluation procedure 5 2.2 Procedure for human factors evaluation 5 3 Framework for the evaluation of safety functions 7 3.1 Situational Control concept 7 3.2 Adapted Vshape design cycle 11 3.3 Relation between technical, human factors and safety potential evaluation 13 4 Proposal for technical evaluation procedure 18 4.1 Assessment framework proposal 18 4.2 Evaluation specification 19 4.2.1 System and functions description 20 4.2.2 Assessment Objectives 24 4.2.3 Expected system impacts 25 4.2.4 Key indicators 25 4.3 Test Definition 29 4.3.1 Synthetic Scenario 29 4.3.2 Tools and methods 31 4.3.3 Data collection and measurement plan 33 4.3.4 Reference case 34 4.4 Execution and reporting 35 4.4.1 Verification 35 4.4.2 Validation 36 4.5 Best practices 36 4.6 Conclusions and Final Remarks 37 5 Human Factors Evaluation procedure 39 5.1 General approach 39 5.1.1 A framework for ADAS human factors evaluation 39 5.2 Procedure 42 5.2.1 Overview 42 5.2.2 Step 1: System and functions description 44 5.2.3 Step 2: Hypothesis generation 45 5.2.4 Step 3: Test scenario selection 50 5.2.5 Step 4: General selection of methods 52 5.2.6 Step 5: Detailed study design 60 5.2.7 Detailed study design of methods 60 5.2.8 Step 6: Reporting and interpretation 64 6 Safety Potential Assessment Procedure 66 6.1 The behavioural effect approach 66 6.2 The procedure of the methodology 68 6.2.1 Description of the functions 68 6.2.2 Literature survey on the effects of the functions 68 6.2.3 Relevant safety impact mechanisms 69 6.2.4 Quantitative assessment of the impacts 70 7 Conclusions and next steps 73 References 75 Annex 1 Keywords 77 Annex 2 Glossary 78 Annex 3 Dummy targets 82
Databáze: OpenAIRE