Comparison of the Sodium Hydroxide Specimen Processing Method with the C18-Carboxypropylbetaine Specimen Processing Method Using Independent Specimens with Auramine Smear, the MB/BacT Liquid Culture System, and the COBAS AMPLICOR MTB Test

Autor: Padilla, Eduardo, Manterola, Jose´ M., Gonza´lez, Victoria, Thornton, Charles G., Quesada, M. Dolores, Sa´nchez, M. Dolores, Pe´rez, Miguel, Ausina, Vicente
Zdroj: Journal of Clinical Microbiology; December 2005, Vol. 43 Issue: 12 p6091-6097, 7p
Abstrakt: ABSTRACTA study was performed to diagnose tuberculosis by smear, culture, and nucleic acid amplification. The study was comprised of two independent arms. Each arm used a different specimen processing method; in one arm, all specimens were processed with N-acetyl-l-cysteine-sodium hydroxide, and in the other arm, all specimens were processed with C18-carboxypropylbetaine and lytic enzymes. In each arm, all processed sediments were split for analysis by auramine smear, by culture using the MB/BacT liquid culture system and solid media, and by nucleic acid amplification using the COBAS AMPLICOR MTB test. In the N-acetyl-l-cysteine-sodium hydroxide arm, 1,468 specimens were analyzed: 65 were smear positive; 88 and 42 were culture positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosisand nontuberculous mycobacteria, respectively; and 103 were PCR positive. Relative to cultures positive for M. tuberculosis, the sensitivity and specificity of the smear were 68.2% and 99.6%, respectively, and those of PCR were 75.0% and 97.3%, respectively. In the C18-carboxypropylbetaine study arm, 1,423 specimens were analyzed: 44 were smear positive; 82 and 31 were culture positive for M. tuberculosisand nontuberculous mycobacteria, respectively; and 91 were PCR positive. The sensitivity and specificity of the smear were 48.8% and 99.7%, respectively, and those of PCR were 78.0% and 98.0%, respectively. When the two arms were compared, C18-carboxypropylbetaine specimen processing significantly increased the number of smear-negative and culture-positive specimens and significantly increased the PCR sensitivity among this same group of specimens while at the same time significantly reducing the inhibition rate.
Databáze: Supplemental Index