| Abstrakt: |
The article discusses the constitutionality of a bill passed in Pennsylvania in 1987 stating that the legislators can increase their expense allowances, including an inseverability clause. It explores a case filed in 1987 by private citizens and a state representative that was later dismissed, stating that the plaintiffs only presented themselves in writing. It stresses that though inseverability clauses have justifiable uses, the context in which they are used in the bill is questionable. |
