Adaptation and Validation of a Moral Distress Instrument in Mental Health Nurses.
| Autor: | Bruggmann, Mario Sergio, Schneider, Dulcinéia Ghizoni, Souza Ramos, Flávia Regina, Vargas, Mara Ambrosina, Brehmer, Laura Cavalcanti de Farias, Bhering, Ácmon |
|---|---|
| Předmět: |
CROSS-sectional method
EMPLOYEE rights PROFESSIONAL autonomy MULTITRAIT multimethod techniques PSYCHOLOGICAL distress RESEARCH methodology evaluation WORK environment HOSPITAL nursing staff RESEARCH evaluation REHABILITATION of people with mental illness DESCRIPTIVE statistics PSYCHIATRIC nurses ETHICS REHABILITATION centers JOB stress RESEARCH methodology RESEARCH FACTOR analysis SELF advocacy PSYCHIATRIC hospitals VALUES (Ethics) INDUSTRIAL safety NURSING ethics SOCIAL problems PROFESSIONAL competence CONFLICT management INDUSTRIAL relations EMPLOYEES' workload |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Nursing Measurement; 2024, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p434-444, 11p |
| Abstrakt: | Background and Purpose: To adapt and validate the Brazilian Scale of Moral Distress in Nurses for the mental health field. Methods: A cross-sectional methodological study was carried out, adapted with the contribution of 34 specialists, and validated by 173 mental health nurses. Results: The validated scale consists of 37 items divided into seven factors, and they were responsible for 77.2% of variance—working conditions, advocacy for the values and rights, professional safety and autonomy, ethical violations, social conflicts, ethical–professional competence, and conflicts with the management, with coefficient α at.972 for the entire instrument, and ranging from.852 to.949 for the constructs. Conclusion: The results provide evidence that the adapted instrument is reliable, valid, and consistent in measuring moral distress in mental health nurses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: | Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|