Comparison of Efficacy of Pressure Controlled vs. Traditional Manual Mask Ventilation for Newborn Resuscitation – A Simulation-Based Pilot Randomized Control Trial.

Autor: Kalane, Shilpa, Upadhye, Vaibhavi, Mulay, Atul V., Prayag, Amrita P.
Zdroj: Indian Journal of Pediatrics; Oct2024, Vol. 91 Issue 10, p1008-1013, 6p
Abstrakt: Objectives: To determine efficacy of non-invasive positive pressure face mask ventilation using a ventilator device (NIPPmV) for achieving early effective ventilation compared to that by self-inflating bag (SIB) or T- piece resuscitator (TPR). Methods: The authors video recorded 33 trained resuscitators using NIPPmV (provided using ventilator device), SIB [a 500 ml silicone SIB without a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) valve] and a TPR. Using a continuous pressure recording system and a neonatal manikin, the authors evaluated the efficacy of the ventilation to achieve early effective ventilation during 30 s of ventilation. The primary outcome was time to achieve effective chest rise. Secondary outcomes were peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), ventilation rate and the need to perform ventilation corrective steps during positive pressure ventilation (PPV) among the devices. Results: Total 99 videos were recorded. The time(s) taken to achieve the first chest rise was significantly lesser in NIPPmV group compared to SIB and TPR (3.0 ± 1.7 vs. 3.7 ± 1.9 vs. 7.5 ± 5.4, respectively, p <0.001). The mean PIP delivered by NIPPmV compared to SIB & TPR (19.8 ± 1.6 vs. 35.6 ± 7.4 vs. 17.8 ± 2.0 cm H20 respectively; p <0.001) was more accurate with preset PIP. Ventilation, in terms of breath rate, was observed to be controlled more accurately with NIPPmV compared to SIB & TPR (50 vs. 42 vs. 33 per min respectively; p <0.001). Conclusions: The non-invasive positive pressure face mask ventilation using a ventilator (NIPPmV) resulted in achieving early, effective and consistent ventilation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index
Externí odkaz: