Percutaneous removal of hardware after orthopedic surgery: Is it safe? and What are patients saying?

Autor:	Page, Brian Joseph, Sheridan, Gerard A., Greenstein, Michael D., Reif, Taylor J., Fragomen, Austin T., Rozbruch, S. Robert
Předmět:	ANTIBIOTICS ACADEMIC medical centers CHRONIC pain ORTHOPEDIC implants QUESTIONNAIRES KRUSKAL-Wallis Test MEDICAL device removal RETROSPECTIVE studies INFECTION HEMATOMA TREATMENT effectiveness DESCRIPTIVE statistics ORTHOPEDIC surgery SURGICAL complications SURVEYS MEDICAL records ACQUISITION of data PAIN DATA analysis software PHYSICAL mobility
Zdroj:	European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology; Aug2024, Vol. 34 Issue 6, p3135-3143, 9p
Abstrakt:	Objectives: To analyze our patient's complication profile and rate after removal of hardware (ROH) surgery, and survey our patients to ask their overall status and improvement in symptomatology post-operatively. Design: Retrospective chart review and survey. Setting: Academic, tertiary referral center. Patients/participants: 173 patients with 314 pieces of hardware. Seventy-six patients (43.9%) responded to our survey. Intervention: ROH surgery. Main outcome measurements: Patient demographics and complications were recorded. All patients were sent a brief 3-question survey which asked: (1) Why did you get your hardware removed? (2) How did your overall status change after ROH? (3) How did the ROH affect your stiffness, pain, swelling, and mobility? Results: There were 10 complications (5.5%): 5 infections, 2 with unresolved pain, 1 hematoma, 1 chronic regional pain syndrome exacerbation, and 1 recurrent deformity. All infections were treated with oral antibiotics and improved. All other complications resolved with treatment except for the patient who developed recurrent deformity. Patients underwent ROH surgery because their doctor suggested it (76.3%) and to improve mobility (39.5%). 86.9% reported their overall status improved after ROH. They improved regarding stiffness (73.7%), pain (73.6%), swelling (61.8%), and mobility (76.3%). Similar results were seen among different implants removed. Conclusions: The majority of patients who underwent percutaneous ROH were satisfied. They reported improvement in stiffness, pain, swelling and mobility (greatest improvement). The complication rate was low (5.5%). ROH can be a meaningful operation to patients allowing them to improve their quality of life with a low complication rate. Level of Evidence: Level IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze:	Complementary Index
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu Full text from SpringerLink