Cross Sectional Survey of Antenatal Educators' Views About Current Antenatal Education Provision.

Autor:	Russell-Webster, Tamarind, Davies, Anna, Toolan, Miriam, Lynch, Mary, Plachcinski, Rachel, Larkin, Michael, Fraser, Abigail, Barnfield, Sonia, Smith, Margaret, Burden, Christy, Merriel, Abi
Předmět:	ATTITUDES toward pregnancy CROSS-sectional method NATIONAL health services HEALTH services accessibility LANGUAGE & languages MEDICAL care research MATERNAL health services QUALITATIVE research RESEARCH funding CHILDBIRTH education PSYCHOLOGICAL adaptation PREGNANT women JUDGMENT sampling DESCRIPTIVE statistics TEACHING methods SURVEYS THEMATIC analysis PRENATAL care PATIENT-professional relations QUALITY assurance DATA analysis software CHILDBIRTH teachers PSYCHOSOCIAL factors MEDICAL practice MEDICAL care costs COMMUNICATION barriers
Zdroj:	Maternal & Child Health Journal; Sep2024, Vol. 28 Issue 9, p1520-1529, 10p
Abstrakt:	Objectives: Antenatal education (ANE) is part of National Health Service (NHS) care and is recommended by The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) to increase birth preparedness and help pregnant women/birthing people develop coping strategies for labour and birth. We aimed to understand antenatal educator views about how current ANE supports preparedness for childbirth, including coping strategy development with the aim of identifying targets for improvement. Methods: A United Kingdom wide, cross-sectional online survey was conducted between October 2019 and May 2020. Antenatal educators including NHS midwives and private providers were purposively sampled. Counts and percentages were calculated for closed responses and thematic analysis used for open text responses. Results: Ninety-nine participants responded, 62% of these did not believe that ANE prepared women for labour and birth. They identified practical barriers to accessing ANE, particularly for marginalised groups, including financial and language barriers. Educators believe class content is medically focused, and teaching is of variable quality with some midwives being ill-prepared to deliver antenatal education. 55% of antenatal educators believe the opportunity to develop coping strategies varies between location and educators and only those women who can pay for non-NHS classes are able to access all the coping strategies that can support them with labour and birth. Conclusions for Practice: Antenatal educators believe current NHS ANE does not adequately prepare women for labour and birth, leading to disparities in birth preparedness for those who cannot access non-NHS classes. To reduce this healthcare inequality, NHS classes need to be standardised, with training for midwives in delivering ANE enhanced. Significance: What is Already Known on this Subject?: There is no detailed national guidance about the content or quantity of antenatal education that should be delivered by the NHS to patients and, how coping strategies are developed within these sessions is unknown. What this Study Adds?: Antenatal educators believe that quality of antenatal education needs to be improved. Access to coping strategies for labour and birth is hindered by the type of class, the educator's approach and socioeconomic status. This study can be used to support an argument for addressing the inequality in access to antenatal preparation, whilst better preparing all women through higher quality of antenatal education provision in the NHS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze:	Complementary Index
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu Full text from SpringerLink