Abstrakt: |
This research aims to create innovative compounds that incorporate 1,2,4‐triazole and exhibit α‐glucosidase inhibitory potential. Similar to our previously reported series of N‐aryl 2‐{[5‐(naphthalen‐1‐ylmethyl)‐4‐phenyl‐4H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐3‐yl]thio}acetamide compounds, we explore here 4‐ethyl instead of 4‐phenyl as substituent. The synthesis process effectively yielded these compounds, with the highest yield reaching up to 91 % for compound N‐phenyl‐2‐{[5‐(naphthalen‐1‐ylmethyl)‐4‐ethyl‐4H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐3‐yl]thio}acetamide 5 a. Their structures were validated through various spectroscopic techniques such as IR, 1H‐NMR, 13C‐NMR, and HR‐MS spectra, and for compounds 3, 5 d, and 5 e by X‐ray diffraction. In vitro experiments revealed that only compound 5 g, marked by a 3‐hydroxy substitution on the N‐phenylacetamide moiety, demonstrated higher α‐glucosidase inhibitory potential (IC50=158.4±3.4 μM) compared to the positive control, acarbose (IC50=351.3±1.8 μM). Molecular docking studies also coincide with in vitro assay by uncovering a strong hydrogen bond with residue Asp1526 along with other hydrophobic interactions of compound 5 g in the α‐glucosidase binding pocket. Compound 5 g showed a free binding energy of −9.7 kcal/mol, contrasting with acarbose (−8.0 kcal/mol). Despite the modest biological activity, this research underscores the simplicity and convenience of the procedure for synthesizing 1,2,4‐triazole‐based compounds, and contributes a key feature to the structure‐activity relationship of the triazole scaffold in the α‐glucosidase pocket. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |