| Abstrakt: |
This research seeks to answer the question, what are the theoretical and quantitative criticisms of the good governance model? From a methodological point of view, this research is a theoretical effort and a quantitative comparative method based on structural equation modeling using secondary data has also been used. According to the latest data output of the United Nations (2019), 193 countries are members of this organization, and the data required for this research were available for 103 countries and were selected as the research sample. Quantitative findings showed that the good governance model does not have a good fit, but it improves with the inclusion of the social inequality variable in the model. Also, in the theoretical dimension, despite the positive effects that the implementation of the good governance model can have, there are also criticisms that have been suggested to include indicators of corruption control, efficiency and effectiveness of the government, security, political stability and non-violence, rule of law, quality of regulation, accountability, accountability and the right to express opinions, citizen satisfaction, consensus-oriented, reducing social inequality, lack of domination and domination, transparency, adherence to the interests and wishes of citizens, public monitoring, welfare and social empowerment, meritocracy, freedom and enjoyment of rights and noninterference in the public and private domain should be added to the governance model evaluation criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
