Open versus robot-assisted retroperitoneal tumors resection involving inferior vena cava, abdominal aorta, and renal hilum: a comparative study.
| Autor: | Sulaiman, Manan, Ali, Khan Akhtar, Chunguang, Yang, Hashim, Rubina, Luan, Yang, Xiong, Ze Zhong, Huang, Hui, Wang, Zhihua |
|---|---|
| Předmět: |
SURGICAL robots
VENA cava inferior CROSS-sectional method RETROPERITONEUM BODY mass index STATISTICAL significance HUMAN research subjects SEX distribution INTERVIEWING TREATMENT effectiveness AGE distribution SURGICAL blood loss CHI-squared test DESCRIPTIVE statistics SURGICAL complications ABDOMINAL aorta INFORMED consent (Medical law) COMPARATIVE studies LENGTH of stay in hospitals POSTOPERATIVE period DATA analysis software HEMORRHAGE EVALUATION |
| Zdroj: | Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques; Jun2024, Vol. 38 Issue 6, p3288-3295, 8p |
| Abstrakt: | Introduction: Surgery is currently the only effective treatment for retroperitoneal tumors that do not involve any specific organ. The use of robots for removing both benign and malignant retroperitoneal tumors is considered safe and feasible. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether robotic retroperitoneal tumor resection (RMBRs) is superior to open retroperitoneal malignant resection (OMBRs). This study compares the short-term outcomes of robotic excision of benign and malignant retroperitoneal tumors with open excision of the same-sized tumors. Methods: The study compared demographics and outcomes of patients who underwent robotic resection (n = 54) vs open resection (n = 54) of retroperitoneal tumors between March 2018 and December 2022. A 1:1 matching analysis was conducted to ensure a fair comparison. Results: The study found that RBMRs resulted in reduced operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBM), and postoperative hospital stay (PSH) when compared to OBMRs. Additionally, RBMRs reduced EBL, PHS, and OT for patients with malignant tumor involvement in major vessels. No significant differences were found in tumor size, blood transfusion rate, and morbidity rate between the RBMRs and OBMRs groups. Conclusion: When comparing RMBRs to OMBRs, it was observed that RMBR was associated with lower (EBL), shorter postoperative hospital stays (PHS), and reduced operative time (OT) in a specific group of patients with both benign and malignant tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: | Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|