| Abstrakt: |
Rice is one of the staple foods in Asian countries, and rice paddies are significant sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in agricultural sectors. In addition, drainage practice has been recognized as a key factor influencing both rice production and GHG emissions. In this field pot study, the effect of drainage method (e.g., intermittent drainage (ID) and continuous flooding (CF)) on GHG (CO2 and CH4) emissions was determined from three Korean paddies (BG, MG, and JS series), varying soil properties such as soil texture, labile carbon, and mineral types. The emission of GHGs was evidently influenced by the drainage, depending on the paddy's redox (Eh) shift upon flooding events. The Eh decline upon flooding was slower in JS pot, where pore-water concentration of ferric and sulfate ions is the highest (~up to 3-fold) among three paddies. MG pot was 2- to 3-fold more percolative than the others and the Eh drop during the flooding period was the smallest (staying above −50 mV). In ID treatment, CH4 emission (t CO2-eq ha−1 y−1) was reduced in a wide range by 5.6 for JS pot, 2.08 for BG pot, and 0.29 for MG pot relative to CF, whereas CO2 emissions (t CO2-eq ha−1 y−1) were increased by 1.25 for JS pot, 1.07 for BG pot, and 0.48 for MG pot due to the enhanced oxidation of labile carbon. Grain yield and aboveground biomass production from ID were no less than those from CF (p < 0.05). Consequently, the increase in global warming potential (Σ GWP) by ID varied as the order of JS (37%) > BG (14%) > MG (~0%) pots, and the negligible effect observed for MG pot is due to the equivalent trade-off between CO2 and CH4. The different benefits of drainage practices among paddy pots is due to the redox response of paddy systems. The findings will be helpful to promote the efficacy of drainage practice on mitigating GHG emissions for the sustainable agronomic management of rice paddies in response to climate change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
