| Abstrakt: |
Background: The transfemoral approach (TF) is the access of choice for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, approximately 10% of patients have anatomy or comorbidity unsuitable for TF. Objective: To analyze the outcomes of an alternative approach compared with TF in the authors' institute. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing TAVI in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital between December 2010 and 2021 was conducted. The present study compared the baseline characteristics, outcomes, and complications of TAVI procedures, including one-year mortality, according to whether they were performed through a TF or alternative approach. Results: Among 210 patients that underwent TAVI, 188 (89.6%) were in the TF group and 22 (10.4%) were in the alternative group with seven in the trans-subclavian, nine in the transapical, and six in the transaortic. The mean age of the population was 81 years. Patients in the alternative group had more severe disease (median logistic EuroSCORE-II 19.67 versus 10.01, p<0.001). Other baseline characteristics were not different between groups. According to the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) criteria, there were higher mortality and complication rates in the alternative group but no statistical differences regarding 30-day mortality of TF at 2.1% versus alternative at 9.1% (p=0.121) and 1-year mortality of TF at 5.3% versus alternative at 13.6% (p=0.143). Hospitalization times were significantly longer in the alternative group (median hospital stay in days of TF 4 versus alternative 10, p=0.013). Although no statistical significance was found, there were trends towards a higher rate of valve malposition for TF at 3.7% versus alternative at 13.6%, and major vascular complications for TF at 1.6% versus alternative at 9.1%. Conclusion: The authors' institute data demonstrates alternative approach TAVI was associated with a similar mortality rate and post-procedural complication rate compared with transfemoral TAVI, except for a trend toward a higher rate of valve malposition and major vascular complications. The alternative approach TAVI may be favored in patients with high or prohibitive surgical risk unsuitable for transfemoral TAVI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
