| Autor: |
Fan, Ethan, Dashti, Marjan, Fuentes, Jorge, Reitzer, Larry, Christie, Alana L., Zimmern, Philippe E. |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Neurourology & Urodynamics; Jan2023, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p49-55, 7p |
| Abstrakt: |
Background: d‐mannose is used as preventive measure against recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTIs). We studied d‐mannosuria after a challenge test to identify favorable responders that could be targeted for long‐term preventive therapy. Material and Methods: Following institutional review board approval, women attending a specialized tertiary care center urology clinic with a history of RUTIs were invited to participate by providing a urine sample (baseline), followed by the intake of home‐dose d‐mannose, and a second urine sample 1 h later (post). Urine samples were processed according to a d‐mannosuria assay technique reported previously by our group. d‐mannose concentrations were normalized to urinary creatinine. Results: From July 2020 to March 2021, 26 patients met study criteria. Thirteen had a lower or unchanged ratio of baseline to post d‐mannose, whereas 13 were responders. Among 19 taking 2 g, 12 had a lower or unchanged trend and 7 were responders with >20% increase in the d‐mannose/creatinine ratio. Comparison of urinary baseline d‐mannose/creatinine ratios was significantly different between the responder (mean = 0.337 ± 0.158) and nonresponder (mean = 0.692 ± 0.444; p = 0.016) groups. Urinary post d‐mannose/creatinine ratios did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.46). d‐mannose‐naïve patients had few responders, and age and urinary creatinine did not affect the findings. Conclusion: This preliminary study on d‐mannose challenge tests indicates a urine response if urinary d‐mannose/creatinine ratio is low, which it was in some women with a history of RUTIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text