| Autor: |
Knüver, T., Bär, A., Ganthaler, A., Gebhardt, T., Grams, T. E. E., Häberle, K.‐H., Hesse, B. D., Losso, A., Tomedi, I., Mayr, S., Beikircher, B., Schuldt, B. |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Plant Biology; Dec2022, Vol. 24 Issue 7, p1240-1253, 14p |
| Abstrakt: |
Climate change is expected to increase the frequency and intensity of summer droughts. Sufficient drought resistance, the ability to acclimate to and/or recover after drought, is thus crucial for forest tree species. However, studies on the hydraulics of mature trees during and after drought in natura are scarce.In this study, we analysed trunk water content (electrical resistivity: ER) and further hydraulic (water potential, sap flow density, specific hydraulic conductivity, vulnerability to embolism) as well as wood anatomical traits (tree ring width, conduit diameter, conduit wall reinforcement) of drought‐stressed (artificially induced summer drought via throughfall‐exclusion) and unstressed Picea abies and Fagus sylvatica trees.In P. abies, ER indicated a strong reduction in trunk water content after 5 years of summer drought, corresponding to significantly lower pre‐dawn leaf water potential and xylem sap flow density. Vulnerability to embolism tended to be higher in drought‐stressed trees. In F. sylvatica, only small differences between drought‐stressed and control trees were observed.Re‐watering led to a rapid increase in water potentials and xylem sap flow of both drought‐stressed trees, and to increased growth rates in the next growing season. ER analyses revealed lower trunk water content in P. abies trees growing on throughfall‐exclusion plots even 1 year after re‐watering, indicating a limited capacity to restore internal water reserves. Results demonstrated that P. abies is more susceptible to recurrent summer drought than F. sylvatica, and can exhibit long‐lasting and pronounced legacy effects in trunk water reserves. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text