Autor: |
Melchenko, Semyon A., Cherekaev, Vasiliy A., Alyoshkina, Olga Yu., Danilov, Gleb V., Musa, Gerald, Strunina, Uliya V., Golbin, Denis A., Lasunin, Nikolay V., Zaychenko, Alexander A. |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Neurosurgical Review; Jun2022, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p2175-2182, 8p |
Abstrakt: |
To perform an adequate orbitozygomatic craniotomy, it is very important that the bone cut which passes through the body of the zygoma reaches the inferior orbital fissure (IOF). To reach the IOF, two surface landmarks on the body of the zygoma are described: a point located directly superior to the malar eminence and the zygomaticofacial foramen. The article explores the reliability of these landmarks and three other alternative points to reach the IOF. Eighty-three adult skulls were used in this study. The IOF dimensions and the relationship with the malar eminence, the point superior to the malar eminence, the zygomaticofacial foramen, and 3 alternative points (E, C, F) were analyzed. The malar eminence was unacceptable for use as a guide to the IOF. The point superior to the malar eminence was also unacceptable as a guide as only 9.4% and 10.9% were in the projection of the IOF on the right and left, respectively. 59.7% of the total zygomaticofacial foramina fell in the IOF projection. The point F fell in the projection of the IOF in 98.8% and 100.0% on the right and left, respectively. The use of the malar eminence as a guide to reach the IOF is unreliable in one third of cases as it is not easily identified intraoperatively in these cases. The zygomaticofacial foramen cannot be considered a reliable surgical landmark to reach the IOF. The authors recommend using a novel landmark which may be identified as a midpoint between intersections of the anterior and posterior margins of the zygomatic frontal process on a line extending from the inferior margin of the zygomatic arc. This point is reliable in 98.8–100% of cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
Externí odkaz: |
|