Does PAX7 and NKX2.2 immunoreactivity in Ewing sarcoma have prognostic significance?

Autor: Machado, Isidro, Charville, Gregory W., Yoshida, Akihiko, Navarro, Samuel, Righi, Alberto, Gambarotti, Marco, Scotlandi, Katia, López-Guerrero, José A., Llombart-Bosch, Antonio
Zdroj: Virchows Archiv: European Journal of Pathology; Apr2022, Vol. 480 Issue 4, p909-917, 9p
Abstrakt: Ewing sarcoma (ES) is an aggressive neoplasm with variable morphology. It has no specific immunoprofile or molecular signature. Neither CD99, NKX2.2 nor PAX7 immunoreactivity alone is completely specific, although diagnostic specificity improves when combined. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of PAX7 in a large series of genetically confirmed ES. Existing results for CD99 and NKX2.2 immunoexpression, morphological findings and molecular studies (fusion gene subtypes) were retrieved from a previous study. Survival analyses were performed in cases with available clinical follow-up. PAX7 was positive in 95.5% of ES with diffuse staining (> 50%) in all positive cases and moderate or strong intensity for most cases. Nineteen ES displayed both PAX7 and CD99 immunoreactivity but lacked NKX2.2 immunoexpression. No relationships could be found between PAX7 expression and the histological types or ES gene fusion subtypes. Univariant/multivariate analysis showed that lack of PAX7 and/or NKX2.2 immunoexpression constitute independent poor prognostic factors for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In conclusion, IHC for CD99, NKX2.2, and PAX7 may be useful in daily practice for ES diagnosis, particularly in hospitals lacking facilities for molecular studies. In addition, the combination of strong CD99 membranous positivity and nuclear PAX7 and NKX2.2 immunoreactivity seems to be very reliable for ES diagnosis when supported by a corroborating histomorphologic and clinical picture. Although PAX7 is not entirely specific for ES, it seems to have a more extensive and strong nuclear immunoreactivity than NKX2.2 expression, even in tumors with decalcification artifact. Considering the prognostically significant data herein reported, we strongly recommend validation in prospective ES series that include localized and disseminated tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index
Externí odkaz: