Evaluation of the Scan Duration and Mechanical and Thermal Indices Applied for the Diagnostic Ultrasound Examinations.

Autor: Fatahi Asl, Jafar, Farzanegan, Zahra, Tahmasbi, Marziyeh, Birgani, Shadab Moradi, Malekzade, Mehrnaz, Yazdaninejad, Hamid
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine; Sep2021, Vol. 40 Issue 9, p1839-1850, 12p
Abstrakt: Objective: Although epidemiological studies have failed to show the harmful effects of ultrasound in humans, as a form of energy, ultrasound has the potential to cause bio‐effects in tissues. Therefore, clinical guidelines have been established for ultrasound technology related to human safety, which include Thermal (TI) and mechanical (MI) indices. The appropriate TI and MI ranges for embryonic examinations are between 0–1.0 and 0–0.4, respectively. The accepted TI and MI ranges are 0–2.0 and 0–1.9, respectively, for general ultrasound examinations. In addition, the scan duration should be kept as low as possible. Therefore, the present study aimed at evaluating the scan duration, TI, and MI as measures of acoustic output during ultrasound studies. Methods: A cross‐sectional descriptive study was conducted for patients undergoing pregnancy checkups, routine checkups, and initial diagnosis ultrasound examinations. Samples were selected from imaging departments of 4 educational hospitals based on convenience sampling and 321 checklists completed by direct observation of ultrasound examinations. Results: For pregnancy scans, the mean TI and MI were obtained as 0.32 ± 0.27 and 1.15 ± 0.13, respectively. For non‐pregnancy examinations, the mean value of TI and MI were 0.30 ± 0.29 and 1.07 ± 0.35, respectively. Therefore, mean TI for pregnancy and non‐pregnancy examinations and mean MI for non‐pregnancy studies obtained lower than the permitted values, while the mean MI was higher than the permitted level for first trimester of pregnancy. Also, relatively suitable scan durations were seen in reviewed studies. Conclusion: From this study, it may be concluded that the reported ultrasound scans were safe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index