Multivariable risk scores for predicting short‐term outcomes for emergency department patients with unexplained syncope: A systematic review.

Autor:	Sweanor, Rachel A. L., Redelmeier, Robert J., Simel, David L., Albassam, Omar T., Shadowitz, Steven, Etchells, Edward E.
Předmět:	EVALUATION of medical care SYNCOPE CINAHL database HOSPITAL emergency services MEDICAL databases INFORMATION storage & retrieval systems MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems CONFIDENCE intervals SYSTEMATIC reviews TIME PATIENTS RISK assessment EMERGENCY medical services DESCRIPTIVE statistics MEDLINE ADVERSE health care events DISEASE risk factors
Zdroj:	Academic Emergency Medicine; May2021, Vol. 28 Issue 5, p502-510, 9p
Abstrakt:	Objectives: Emergency department (ED) patients with unexplained syncope are at risk of experiencing an adverse event within 30 days. Our objective was to systematically review the accuracy of multivariate risk stratification scores for identifying adult syncope patients at high and low risk of an adverse event over the next 30 days. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, and CINAHL) from database creation until May 2020. We sought studies evaluating prediction scores of adults presenting to an ED with syncope. We included studies that followed patients for up to 30 days to identify adverse events such as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiac surgery. We only included studies with a blinded comparison between baseline clinical features and adverse events. We calculated likelihood ratios and confidence intervals (CIs). Results: We screened 13,788 abstracts. We included 17 studies evaluating nine risk stratification scores on 24,234 patient visits, where 7.5% (95% CI = 5.3% to 10%) experienced an adverse event. A Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) of 4 or more was associated with a high likelihood of an adverse event (LRscore≥4 = 11, 95% CI = 8.9 to 14). A CSRS of 0 or less (LRscore≤0 = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.20) was associated with a low likelihood of an adverse event. Other risk scores were not validated on an independent sample, had low positive likelihood ratios for identifying patients at high risk, or had high negative likelihood ratios for identifying patients at low risk. Conclusion: Many risk stratification scores are not validated or not sufficiently accurate for clinical use. The CSRS is an accurate validated prediction score for ED patients with unexplained syncope. Its impact on clinical decision making, admission rates, cost, or outcomes of care is not known. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze:	Complementary Index
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu Plný text