| Abstrakt: |
Objective: To investigate the similarities and differences between Hydration Response Technology (HRT) and negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with regard to wound bed preparation, and to devise a set of recommendations for their use on the basis of the opinion of two panels. Method: An expert panel that analysed in vitro and clinical data as well as the similarities and differences between the two modalities was established. This culminated in a series of recommendations on which modality to use for which indication. These recommendations were presented to a Delphi panel, consisting of users of both NPWT and HRT-dressing. The panel was then asked to produce its own recommendations. Results: The outcomes and recommendations of both panels were reported. NPWT is the preferred treatment modality for abdominal dehisced wounds, and to a lesser extent, for surgical wound healing by secondary intention. For all other indications, the treatment modalities are at least equal, with HRT-dressing often being the superior mode to treat wounds such as venous leg ulcers, arterial ulcers and vasculitis. Conclusion: In the opinion of the expert panel and the Delphi panel, both modalities share a number of clinical and non-clinical properties. However, because of the numerous advantages of HRT technology, HRT dressing has the potential to replace NPWT in a number of indications, where the patient, healthcare providers and institutions may benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
